I would encourage the community to do the same."Ĭity of Sartell Engagement Director Nikki Sweeter has gotten to know Testa well over the course of the past year. But no matter what, it's done now and I'm going to support it. "I know our community agrees that this project is a positive. I think there are better ways we could have crafted the sale. I don't want to pin the restaurant owner against the council in the future. But we won't know what will happen in the future. There's a lot of money tied up in the sport. "I've been around golf my whole life," he said. "Council member Meyer and I are committed to making this successful," Fitzthum said. On Tuesday, Fitzthum reiterated that the decision was final and that the worst outcome now is that the community doesn't rally behind Testa. If this particular golf course ever fails in the future, both the city and Three Tees LLC would be protected without the need to take legal action to enforce the 30-year deed and all stipulations within it." "The city would retain 78 acres of parkland which sits in the heart of our community. Any physical updates to the golf course could be done under a 50/50 cost-sharing model," Fitzthum wrote. "As the ownwer of the 78 acres, the city would be held accountable for ensuring that the irrigation system functions. Fitzthum wanted to remove all deed restrictions which had been put into the purchase agreement to ensure that the property remained a golf course with the city remaining as the underlying owner. He was then hoping that an exclusive golf course operations lease to the new property owner could be created for $1 per year. In his social media post, Fitzthum stated his excitment for the potential new restaurant and amenities at the course, but didn't agree on what should happen with the remaining 78 acres.įitzthum proposed selling a three-acre corner to Testa instead of the entire 81 acres.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |